@phil Cone of congency
Thesis OGR
Thesis OGR by on Scribd
Popular posts from this blog
OGR
I have to say I'm both a little disappointed in myself and feeling better than I did in the last project. Weird huh? Basically, for this first stage I have focused a lot on research, and fully developing my concept before properly diving into drawing it. This has given me a much clearer path than I found myself on in the Invisible Cities project, but has meant that I have ultimately produced fewer thumbnails than I would have liked. I felt like this additional research was necessary to ensure that I wasn't chasing my own tail for a number of days which is how Invisible cities felt at times. So, at this point, although I have less thumbnails right now (more will be uploaded tomorrow), I feel like I am in a much stronger position that I was after the OGR before. OGR1 by Eleanor 'Nelly' Luckett on Scribd More thumbnails tomorrow! Watch this space!!!
The Five Act Structure of the Greatest Showman - Film Review
Three and five act structures are key devices used in effective storytelling. They give narratives and stories a pleasing base structure upon which the weave the elements to create a unique viewpoint. The Greatest Showman has a clear five act structure used beneath all the songs and showy costumes to make it stand up as a narrative. Act 1 - Childhood We see the challenges that Barnum went through as a child. It shows him as a poor tailor’s son struggling to make ends meet. It shows him meeting Charity for the first time. It also shows his father getting ill and eventually passing away, and how he had to beg on the streets for food. Towards the end of the act we see Barnum heading off to make his fortune on the railways. Act 2 - Attempt One We see Barnum come back a wealthy man to marry Charity. They build a home together and have two daughters. Barnum is working at a trading company, but they all get fired when the company’s flotilla sink. Barnum uses the bonds for th
Hi Nelly - okay - this still feels a bit woolly to me - especially in terms of Chapter 2 and 3; in 3 there seems to be a lot of possible case-studies still floating around when by that point you really want to be nailing your colours to the mast and using fewer things about which to say/prove/discuss 'everything'. Likewise Chapter 2 - you'd expect to find your specific names/practioners/theorists of disability in here - so right now, it's hard for me to see if you've identified any of these key 'voices' yet. Chapter 1 looks like it starts things generally - so being super clear about what you are and what you're 'not' including in your definition of disability.
ReplyDeleteSo - in order for this to be helpful in helping you put together a decent OGR for Andrew, you need to move away from generalities and 'multiple case-studies' and be much more specified.
I got very very confused about this from the presentation and recording, so I think I'll try and write it up as the OGR and post it early if that's ok?
ReplyDelete