@phil Cone of congency

Comments

  1. Hi Nelly - okay - this still feels a bit woolly to me - especially in terms of Chapter 2 and 3; in 3 there seems to be a lot of possible case-studies still floating around when by that point you really want to be nailing your colours to the mast and using fewer things about which to say/prove/discuss 'everything'. Likewise Chapter 2 - you'd expect to find your specific names/practioners/theorists of disability in here - so right now, it's hard for me to see if you've identified any of these key 'voices' yet. Chapter 1 looks like it starts things generally - so being super clear about what you are and what you're 'not' including in your definition of disability.

    So - in order for this to be helpful in helping you put together a decent OGR for Andrew, you need to move away from generalities and 'multiple case-studies' and be much more specified.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I got very very confused about this from the presentation and recording, so I think I'll try and write it up as the OGR and post it early if that's ok?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Summer project 2017 - Drawings 1-22

The Five Act Structure of the Greatest Showman - Film Review