I have to say I'm both a little disappointed in myself and feeling better than I did in the last project. Weird huh? Basically, for this first stage I have focused a lot on research, and fully developing my concept before properly diving into drawing it. This has given me a much clearer path than I found myself on in the Invisible Cities project, but has meant that I have ultimately produced fewer thumbnails than I would have liked. I felt like this additional research was necessary to ensure that I wasn't chasing my own tail for a number of days which is how Invisible cities felt at times. So, at this point, although I have less thumbnails right now (more will be uploaded tomorrow), I feel like I am in a much stronger position that I was after the OGR before. OGR1 by Eleanor 'Nelly' Luckett on Scribd More thumbnails tomorrow! Watch this space!!!
Hey Nelly... where are your actual theorists? You need some specificity in here in terms of the associated writers/thinkers and their ideas... we talked about the abject at length when we spoke... where's Kristeva, for example? I think you need to look at The Uncanny too in relation to disability and bodily deformation... (Freud) ... in terms of 'appearance research' check this link out and the reading list too... You need more specificity in here, Nelly :
ReplyDeletehttps://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-21/edition-6/psychology-and-visible-difference
Ok I will update it before tomorrow. Thank you. 🙂
ReplyDelete