The Cabinet of Dr Caligari Film Review
The Cabinet
of Dr Caligari Film Review
The Cabinet of Dr Caligari (1920) is a highly theatrical film.
Many of the elements of the visual presentation are more what we would now
associate with a theatre production than a large-scale movie franchise. The
sets and makeup are highly graphical and lack any large amounts of detail,
however it is easily one of the most influential films in progressing our
cinema forward to the point at which we are now, and many of the
concepts/methods used in this film are still highly applicable today.
The sets strongly
use famous works of art and/or artists to influence and give them direction.
For example, Alan’s house is highly reminiscent of the Bedroom in Arles by
Vincent van Gough. See Figure 1 and 2 below.
Figure 1. Screenshot from opening of Dr Caligari
(1920)
Figure 2. Bedroom in Arles (1888)
Although
the set for Alan’s bedroom is not an exact copy, there are clear similarities
in the way that the room is arranged and presented. This is highly interesting
as the painting in Fig. 2 was painted a few months before Van Gough’s
unfortunate demise, at a time during which he was clearly disturbed. This draws
interesting parallels to the behaviour and state of mind of Francis (the lead
male in the movie), who seems to be delusional about his situation and seems to
perceive the world entirely differently to everyone around him. Although the
room we see in Fig. 1 belongs to Alan, we only ever see Francis’ perception of
the room, not anyone else’s. It is there for possible that it is meant to be a
subtle reference to the deteriorating state of Francis’ mental health. As P.G.
Wodehouse (1916) says in his novel Uneasy Money,
“A man’s
subconscious self is not the ideal companion. It lurks for the greater part of
his life in some dark den of its own, hidden away, and emerges only to taunt
and deride and increase the misery of a miserable hour.”
The Cabinet
of Dr Caligari is also a key example of the Expressionist movement in its
styling and art style. The art directors clearly decided that they wanted to
make a world that was as strange and challenging as possible. For this reason,
they made the architectural decision to eliminate perfectly straight lines from
many of the sets, opting instead for more curved or irregular shapes. These
give the movie a highly unique aesthetic and contribute to the gothic feel that
radiates from the styling. This is also contributed to using strong and highly
striking greasepaint style makeup both on the male and female cast. The entire
way that the costume designers, makeup designers and art directors have decided
to portray the settings and characters tie together to form a very interesting,
deep and intense aesthetic. The makeup artists have added to the natural
features of Werner Krauss (Dr Caligari) for his “mad professor” persona, to
create a stronger, more striking character, and aid his acting in portraying
the extremes that his character required. This combined with the striking sets
leads to a incredibly strong portrayal.
Its also
worth noting that in his “evil” persona, he wears white gloves. These were
traditionally worn by mime artists, however have more recently been worn by
characters who are intended to be hiding something. This would make sense as in
Francis’ mind Dr Caligari is hiding his true intentions and behaviours from the
rest of the community and only he is aware of them. It is worth noting that
many villains in this period wore white gloves, and makes it a particularly
interesting that Walt Disney chose to put his favourite creations in white
gloves. Walt Disney (1954) did explain:
“We didn't want him to have mouse hands, because he was
supposed to be more human. So we gave him gloves. Five Fingers looked like too
much on such a little figure, so we took one away. That was just one less
finger to animate.”
The Cabinet
of Dr Caligari also has a strong use of Chiaroscuro. This is purposely
heightened, beyond the effect of the monochrome film itself, as it adds to the
Gothic feel as well as framing and emphasising key ideas and/or characters. The
art team decided to paint fake shadows onto walls, use closed down shots and
heavy eye makeup to create tension and suspense in shots such as the image of
Caeser (Fig. 3). His heavy eye makeup and the shadow created on his face makes
him seem a lot more supernatural and shocking than if it had been entirely
natural lighting.
Figure 3. Caeser (1920)
The
gestures and facial expressions used in silent movies also have their own
language, much in the same way as classical ballet, and are often viewed to be
an extension of Victorian Melodrama. The over-enlarged movements are used to keep
the audience engaged through-out the film sections of the movie, knowing full
well that they will have to sit and read through all the subtitles afterwards.
As with ballet, it is expected that the standardised movements will allow the
audience to understand what is happening whilst the action is taking place,
rather than restricting them to finding out later, after the event has already
taken place.
The Cabinet
of Dr Caligari, alongside many other films of this period, present us with a
lot of conflicts, both as an anachronistic outsider and considering the
complete context of the piece. However, I believe this is part of its charm.
Although the subtitles can sometimes make it a little difficult to get lost in
the story, the actual quality of the filming and the highly technical (for the
period) special effects that have been used are truly one of the major stepping
stones to getting to where we are in cinema today. Not the easiest film to
watch in one sitting, but one that all film makers should watch as part of
their education.
List of illustrations:
Figure 1. Screenshot from opening of Dr Caligari
(1920) [Screenshot] At: http://741836.weebly.com/german-cinema-german-expressionism/german-expressionism-cinema-or-theatre
(Accessed on 23.09.2017)
Figure 2. Bedroom in Arles (1888) [Oil Painting]
At: http://www.parisprovencevangogh.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/van-gogh-bedroom-at-arles.jpg
(Accessed on 23.09.2017)
Figure 3.
Caeser (1920) [Screenshot] At: http://www.edisonstudio.it/wp-content/uploads/CaligariCesareOcchiAperti2.jpg
(Accessed on 23.09.2017)
Bibliography:
Chare, N. and Watkins, L. (2015) Introduction: gesture in film At: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14797585.2014.920189 (Accessed 23.09.2017)
Edison studios (2016) The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari: Music for Cinema. At: http://www.edisonstudio.it/en/portfolio-items/opera-edison-2/ (Accessed on 23.09.2017)
Guardian (2014) Why does Mickey Mouse wear gloves? Are there any films in which he isn't wearing them? At: https://www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-1495,00.html (Accessed on 23.09.2017)
Katz, S. (1991) Film directing shot by shot. Michigan, USA: Focal Press
Kibley, P. (2016) Cracking the code: The meaning of mime in ballet At: http://www.roh.org.uk/news/cracking-the-code-the-meaning-of-mime-in-ballet (Accessed 23.09.2017)
Wodehouse, P. G. (1916) Uneasy Money. USA: D. Appleton & Co
Hi Nelly,
ReplyDeleteCongrats on getting your first review up. I found your use of supporting quotes interesting, in so much as they were not directly associated with the film, but rather helping you make a more 'sideways' point. If I'm being honest, I'm not sure of the relevance of the Mickey Mouse quote to Caligari... but choosing a quote of from a book contemporaneous to the film itself is a creative strategy, but it does seem as if you looked everywhere except at what people had written about the film itself!
I just want to make an example from your opening paragraph:
"Many of the elements of the visual presentation are more what we would now associate with a theatre production than a large-scale movie franchise. The sets and makeup are highly graphical and lack any large amounts of detail, however it is easily one of the most influential films in progressing our cinema forward to the point at which we are now, and many of the concepts/methods used in this film are still highly applicable today."
If you look at this paragraph you make 2 big generalisations about the film - you assert that we might associate Caligari with theatre design and then you assert the film's influence on cinema. You don't 'prove' either of these points; you don't provide any supporting evidence to scaffold these claims. It's not that they sound unreasonable or you're not 'right' - it's just you don't prove it. Those three quotes we ask you to use are a minimum requirement; this single paragraph requires two if, in academic terms, your reader is to take your argument seriously.
I'd suggest you need to think about the 'remit' of your review before you write it, and therefore research in a more purposeful, subject-specific way.
Hi Nellie,
ReplyDeleteI found this an interesting review, and certainly when you come to write your longer essays, there will be opportunities to explore a wider range of sources for your quote material; however as Phil says, for these reviews you should stick to what others have written about the film.
You have slipped into writing in the first person at the end there - 'I believe this is part of its charm' - you could have gone for something like 'which could be seen as part of its charm'.
All in all, I enjoyed reading your review - I particularly found the links between Alan's room and the Van Gogh painting interesting. Well refrenced too! Looking forward to the next one!